LedgerAtlasEvidence directorySubmit a tool

Evidence comparison / two records

Datarails vs Double

Read two dated LedgerAtlas records side by side. Differences are shown as recorded observations, not as scores or recommendations.

01 / Recorded observations

Evidence matrix

Each value is copied from the registry and its dated source record. Unknown fields remain visible.

FieldDatarailsDouble
Category
Reporting & advisory
Bookkeeping automation
Recorded workflows
Reporting & advisory
Bookkeeping automation · Close & reconciliation
Ledger integrations
Other · Unverified
QuickBooks Online
Firm-size fit
50+ clients · Not stated
5-15 clients · 15-50 clients · 50+ clients
Workflow replaced
Manual consolidation and recurring FP&A reporting across spreadsheets.
Recurring transaction review and bookkeeping work performed manually in QuickBooks Online.
Pricing model and notes
Contact sales — The official site provides a demo and sales-contact path rather than public prices.
Contact sales — Public pricing was not stated on the observed site; a sales path is available.
AI depth
Assistive
Mixed
Free tier
No free tier stated
Not stated
Other integrations
Excel · ERP systems
Not stated
Verification status
Unverified
Unverified
Last checked
2026-09-14
2026-09-14

02 / Source registers

What each record cites

Datarails

  1. 01
    Datarails FP&A platform

    Excel-centered FP&A product scope.

    Datarails · observed 2026-09-14
  2. 02
    Datarails integrations

    Published ERP and data connections; QBO/Xero status remains unverified.

    Datarails · observed 2026-09-14

Double

  1. 01
    Double for accounting firms

    AI-assisted bookkeeping scope and QuickBooks Online context.

    Double · observed 2026-09-14
  2. 02
    Double product

    Workflow description; public pricing remains unverified.

    Double · observed 2026-09-14